{
  "url": "https://blockindex.ai/coin/form",
  "name": "Four",
  "links": {
    "github": null,
    "website": "https://four.com/",
    "whitepaper": null
  },
  "dScore": 31,
  "market": {
    "priceUsd": 0.23502425569895635,
    "marketCapUsd": 89748067.41615696,
    "volume24hUsd": 7011320.73452224,
    "priceChange7dPct": -1.1533118,
    "priceChange24hPct": -0.87734677
  },
  "source": "BlockIndex.AI",
  "supply": {
    "max": 580000000,
    "circulating": 381867255.144574,
    "circulatingPct": 65.83918192147827
  },
  "ticker": "FORM",
  "founder": "N/A",
  "vcFunded": true,
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-19T06:00:28.245544+00:00",
  "fairLaunch": false,
  "launchYear": null,
  "description": "Four (FORM), previously known as BinaryX (BNX), is a BEP-20 token built on Binance Smart Chain that has pivoted from its origins in decentralized derivatives infrastructure toward a focused GameFi and IGO (Initial Game Offering) ecosystem. The project functions as a utility token within an expanding stack of in-house titles and incubation services; notable published titles include CyberDragon and CyberArena, and the team released CyberChess in September 2022 as a marquee play-and-earn / play-and-progress title. Public materials and aggregator snapshots portray Four as a tokenized governance and economic layer for game economies — powering in-game purchases, staking for DAO participation, and serving as the primary utility for IGO launches. The project has sought third‑party credibility via a Certik audit (security score reported as 83) and has documented backing from Binance Labs, though public-facing documentation leaves key identity and vesting details opaque: team members are described as anonymous and specific launch or vesting dates for allocations are not fully enumerated in the available sources.\n\nTechnically, Four is not a standalone blockchain but a BEP-20 smart contract deployed on the BNB Chain. As such its architecture and security assumptions inherit the BNB Chain validator model and tooling: listings and explorer integrations are built around BSC/Binance Smart Chain infrastructure rather than a native block production model. The token contract (truncated address 0x5b73...b5E284 in the source material) appears in DEX-mode pages and market aggregator snapshots, with supply metrics including a max supply of 580,000,000 FORM and a total supply near 572.3M FORM in snapshot data. The project’s on-chain posture is therefore defined by tokenomics, marketplace liquidity, and integrations with wallets and DEX/CEX markets rather than protocol-level parameters like block timing or native mining. Available material documents allocation buckets (genesis mining, liquidity provisioning, marketing/LP reserve, and team allocation) but does not present a single explicit premine or PIP figure in a dedicated field; the allocation text in the sources was inconsistent with some supply snapshots, so exact pre-issue percentages remain unconfirmed in the provided files.\n\nFrom an ecosystem and adoption perspective, Four has meaningful distribution through both centralized and decentralized channels. Verified exchange listings in the source data include Tier 1 CEXs (Binance, Gate.io) and major DEXs (Uniswap, PancakeSwap), and analytics platforms (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko) provide visibility and market snapshots. The project has active product-level activity through games and IGO operations (the first IGO referenced as \"SHIT IGO\" in the scraped content), which form part of its roadmap to onboard Web2 developers into Web3 game economies. Market snapshots in the provided files show mid-cap trading metrics (sample price ~$0.343, market cap ≈ $131M, 24h volume ≈ $8.34M) with historical price extremes recorded in the data: an all-time low of $0.143 (2025-02-03) and an all-time high of $4.19 (2025-08-10). Holders and circulating supply statistics are also presented in the ATH snapshot (circulating ≈ 381.86M FORM, ~65.84% of max supply), providing useful context for economic modelling and investor analysis.\n\nGovernance is described in the sources as DAO-oriented: public descriptions reference a BinaryX DAO / DAO governance system for protocol-level decisions, and Binance Labs backing is noted as a strategic credibility factor. However, fine-grained governance mechanics (on-chain vs off-chain, voting thresholds, proposal lifecycle, and token lockup/vesting schedules) are not fully documented in the supplied materials. The audit by Certik and listings on major exchanges are positive signals for security and liquidity, but the combination of anonymous team members and incomplete vesting transparency remains a material open risk for deep DSCORE evaluation. Moving forward, the project’s trajectory is centered on delivering additional IGO activity, growing game volumes and retention, and improving transparency around team identities and allocation vesting to strengthen trust and governance resilience.",
  "methodology": "https://blockindex.ai/dscore",
  "classification": {
    "layer": "Layer 1",
    "isToken": true,
    "consensus": "PoS",
    "parentChain": "BNB"
  },
  "dScoreComponents": {
    "autonomy": 5,
    "ageHistory": 11,
    "governance": 15,
    "nodeDistribution": 0,
    "initialDistribution": 0
  },
  "decentralizationVerdict": "Centralized Leaning"
}