{
  "url": "https://blockindex.ai/coin/grass",
  "name": "Grass",
  "links": {
    "github": null,
    "website": "https://www.grass.io/",
    "whitepaper": "https://grass-foundation.gitbook.io/grass-docs"
  },
  "dScore": 23,
  "market": {
    "priceUsd": 0.39097781627073375,
    "marketCapUsd": 95361479.85649459,
    "volume24hUsd": 26668987.13224889,
    "priceChange7dPct": 5.75585665,
    "priceChange24hPct": -6.99524431
  },
  "source": "BlockIndex.AI",
  "supply": {
    "max": null,
    "circulating": 243905091,
    "circulatingPct": null
  },
  "ticker": "GRASS",
  "founder": "N/A",
  "vcFunded": false,
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-19T06:00:19.228596+00:00",
  "fairLaunch": false,
  "launchYear": 2024,
  "description": "Grass (GRASS) is a Solana-native token and consumer-oriented data-collection platform that aims to monetize idle consumer bandwidth by crowd-sourcing web-scraping and data collection through the GrassApp. The project is positioned as an alternative to centralized web-crawling monopolies by enabling millions of users to contribute device resources in the background; participants earn points (Uptime Points and Network Points) that feed into token reward distributions managed by the Grass Foundation. The most prominent early milestone for Grass was a large airdrop on October 28, 2024, when 100,000,000 tokens were distributed to more than two million users. Documentation and governance notes are published through the Grass website and a GitBook, and market-data snapshots on CoinMarketCap and CryptoCompare indicate the token has an active market presence and a meaningful holder base.\n\nTechnically, GRASS functions as an SPL token on the Solana blockchain. The project leverages Solana’s token infrastructure for transfer and market listings while operating its own off-chain orchestration and client software (the GrassApp) that runs on consumer devices to capture and process data. The sources do not disclose low-level protocol implementation details such as contract decimals, chain IDs, or on-chain upgrade mechanisms for GRASS itself; rather, the token’s economic model and distribution mechanics are the primary disclosed elements. The architecture centers on client-side apps, a points-to-token conversion system, and foundation-managed distributions rather than an independent blockchain or a staking/mining consensus native to the token itself.\n\nGrass’s primary use case is crowdsourced data-collection for AI and analytics customers — selling or licensing cleaned datasets produced by the distributed user base. The GrassApp is designed to be lightweight and run passively, enabling mainstream users to participate without deep crypto knowledge; marketing claims highlight large installed-base figures (marketing copy references “trusted by over 8.5M users” and “over 3 million users running nodes” to collect data). The ecosystem includes market visibility on major data aggregators (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, CryptoCompare) and DEX platforms on Solana (Orca, Jupiter) as the main on-chain trading venues. While the software and app distribution channels are visible and developer documentation is published on GitBook, the project’s reliance on mass consumer adoption, app distribution, and off-chain coordination are central to its value proposition and also a point of operational concentration and risk.\n\nTokenomics are partially documented in the provided materials: total supply is 1,000,000,000 GRASS with a circulating supply snapshot of 243,905,091 (~24.39%) in the market-data snapshots. The inaugural airdrop on 2024-10-28 distributed 100,000,000 tokens (10% of total supply) to onboard users; subsequent distributions and issuance policy are governed by the Grass Foundation rather than a fully transparent on-chain emission schedule. Governance and distribution decisions are foundation-controlled (off-chain) and there is no evidence of an on-chain DAO voting mechanism in the supplied files. The project points to continued user growth, additional airdrops, and commercial data licensing as future priorities, while many technical and organizational details (founder identities, detailed treasury allocations, premine or PIP specifics beyond the initial airdrop) are not present in the provided sources and would require additional disclosure to fully evaluate decentralization and long-term monetary policy.",
  "methodology": "https://blockindex.ai/dscore",
  "classification": {
    "layer": "Layer 2",
    "isToken": true,
    "consensus": "N/A",
    "parentChain": "SOL"
  },
  "dScoreComponents": {
    "autonomy": 0,
    "ageHistory": 7,
    "governance": 16,
    "nodeDistribution": 0,
    "initialDistribution": 0
  },
  "decentralizationVerdict": "Centralized Leaning"
}