{
  "url": "https://blockindex.ai/coin/pump",
  "name": "Pump.fun",
  "links": {
    "github": null,
    "website": "https://pump.fun/",
    "whitepaper": null
  },
  "dScore": 48,
  "market": {
    "priceUsd": 0.001401124043559406,
    "marketCapUsd": 485950658.93013406,
    "volume24hUsd": 51252587.50914491,
    "priceChange7dPct": -3.92360636,
    "priceChange24hPct": -4.11984243
  },
  "source": "BlockIndex.AI",
  "supply": {
    "max": 1000000000000,
    "circulating": 346829148471.1292,
    "circulatingPct": 34.682914847112926
  },
  "ticker": "PUMP",
  "founder": "N/A",
  "vcFunded": false,
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-19T06:00:36.685746+00:00",
  "fairLaunch": false,
  "launchYear": null,
  "description": "Pump.fun (PUMP) is a Solana-native utility token designed to support and incentivize activity across the Pump.Fun ecosystem, which includes the pump.fun launch platform and the swap.pump.fun automated market maker (AMM). The available source materials portray PUMP primarily as a promotional and utility asset: token holders may opt into giveaways, promotional mechanics, and platform-specific incentive programs, while the Pump.Fun protocols themselves are permissionless. The project's public profile is dominated by market-data provider listings and DEX-mode references (CoinMarketCap, CryptoCompare, CoinGecko and Solana DEX infrastructure), and the supplied materials focus heavily on token economics and market presence rather than organizational disclosures. Key organizational details such as founders, legal entity, whitepaper, and detailed governance structures are not documented in the provided files, which biases the public profile toward market and on-chain listing information rather than corporate transparency.\n\nTechnically, PUMP is an SPL token living on the Solana blockchain and therefore inherits the underlying chain's consensus and runtime characteristics (Solana's PoS/PoH design). The token contract identifier is present in dataset snapshots and DEX-mode links, confirming on-chain representation and tradability across Solana-native DEX routes. There is no on-chain protocol or independent consensus to evaluate for PUMP itself (it is not a layer-1 chain), and the project materials do not include a project GitHub repository, open-source license statement, or detailed developer technical roadmap. The project's core technical narrative is straightforward: PUMP functions as a utility token that interacts with AMM pools, swap interfaces and launch/airdrop mechanics native to the Pump.Fun tooling stack. No evidence for staking mechanics, validator infrastructure, or custom consensus components tied to PUMP is present in the supplied files.\n\nIn terms of tokenomics and market dynamics, the provided snapshots document a very large nominal maximum supply (1,000,000,000,000 PUMP) with roughly 354,000,000,000 PUMP reported as circulating at the sampled snapshot (35.4% circulation). Market snapshots in the supplied dataset show active listings, a substantial 24-hour trading volume (snapshot: $138.92M), and an observed price in the $0.00199 range at the cited snapshot. An all-time high of $0.01214 (Jul 12, 2025) and an all-time low of $0.001133 (Oct 10, 2025) are recorded in the market-page excerpts. The publicly available data in the provided files does not disclose premine percentages, PIP allocations, developer-fund splits, or vesting arrangements; because those critical distribution fields are not present in the materials, they cannot be reliably inferred. The token’s high nominal supply profile and marketing-oriented utility design imply sensitivity to listings and promotional events, while the CoinMarketCap/CoinGecko/CryptoCompare coverage indicates reasonable market discoverability and exchange routing across Solana DEXs and several centralized venues.\n\nGovernance and organizational transparency are not evidenced in the available dataset: there are no documented founders, no named CEO or centralized corporate entity, and no sign of on-chain DAO governance or community treasury controls in the provided files. The data therefore supports neither an assertion of centralized company control nor the presence of an on-chain DAO; governance, treasury custody and legal status remain undocumented. The development roadmap, upgrade cadence and longer-term protocol milestones are likewise not present in the extracted materials. Going forward, the most valuable follow-up steps to improve the profile would be collection of primary documentation (team and foundation disclosures, whitepaper or tokenomics paper, GitHub repos), explicit premine/PIP/dev-fund statements, and authoritative contract/explorer links to verify holders and vesting schedules. These additions would materially improve risk assessment, distribution scoring, and long-term governance analysis.",
  "methodology": "https://blockindex.ai/dscore",
  "classification": {
    "layer": "Layer 2",
    "isToken": true,
    "consensus": "N/A",
    "parentChain": "SOL"
  },
  "dScoreComponents": {
    "autonomy": 0,
    "ageHistory": 7,
    "governance": 16,
    "nodeDistribution": 0,
    "initialDistribution": 25
  },
  "decentralizationVerdict": "Moderately Decentralized"
}