Meteora (MET): D-Score 48/100 — Moderately Decentralized BlockIndex D-Score: 48/100 (Moderately Decentralized). Meteora (MET) is a Layer 2 cryptocurrency using N/A consensus. Meteora (MET): Solana-native DEX token powering DLMM, Dynamic AMMs and Dynamic Vaults for capital efficiency. Source: https://blockindex.ai/coin/met · Data by BlockIndex.AI · Updated 2026-06-19 D-Score breakdown (0-100, higher means more decentralized) Component: Score: Overall D-Score: 48: Node distribution: 0: Initial distribution: 25: Governance: 16: Age and history: 7: Autonomy: 0: Key facts - Layer: Layer 2 - Consensus: N/A (N/A) - Launch: N/A - Founder: N/A - VC funded: No - Max supply: 1,000,000,000 - Circulating: 524,023,857 (52.4%) Market data (as of 2026-06-19) - Price: $0.13 - Market cap: $68.33M - 24h volume: $39.79M - 24h change: +15.74% · 7d change: +25.33% About Meteora (MET) is presented in the supplied materials as a Solana-native governance and utility token powering a decentralized exchange (DEX) and a suite of liquidity infrastructure products. The project is consistently described around three core product primitives — DLMM Pools, Dynamic AMM Pools, and Dynamic Vaults — which are framed as the primary mechanisms for improving capital efficiency, yield generation, and composability within Solana’s DeFi ecosystem. The available sources emphasize market visibility (CoinMarketCap DEX Mode and analytics embeds) and token-level metrics (max supply, circulating supply, price, market cap, holders), but do not include primary team, company registration, or formal launch documentation in the supplied files. As a result, the profile assembled here focuses on product design, tokenomics metrics visible in market snapshots, and integration points within the Solana DeFi landscape rather than on corporate governance or founding biographies. From a technical and architectural perspective, the materials consistently state that MET is a Solana SPL token and is designed to integrate natively with Solana DeFi primitives. The documentation highlights composability and on-chain capital efficiency as core goals: DLMM (discrete liquidity market maker) pools aim to concentrate liquidity and optimize trade execution, Dynamic AMMs attempt to adapt curve parameters or routing to market conditions, and Dynamic Vaults provide programmable yield-bearing abstractions for liquidity providers. There is no project-level repository, version history, or mainnet launch date provided in the supplied data, and no Solana validator/node metrics specific to MET were included. The token therefore inherits Solana’s consensus and runtime characteristics rather than maintaining its own independent blockchain metrics. The supplied market data and tokenomics information are the strongest, highest-confidence elements in the material. CoinMarketCap-derived snapshots list a max supply of 1,000,000,000 MET, a circulating supply around 484,958,261 MET (≈48.50% of max), and a total supply snapshot reported near ~997.73M MET. The on-chain identifier presented in DEX-mode and market pages (a Solana token reference string) is available in the sources. Market snapshots in the supplied files show a live price near $0.223984, market capitalization approximately $108.62M, and 24-hour trading volume around $19.8M. Price extremes reported in the material include an All-Time High of $0.9002 (noted on Oct 23, 2025 in the provided snapshots) and an All-Time Low of $0.2041 (noted Dec 18, 2025). Holders and profile-score metadata from CMC (e.g., ~44.58K holders and a profile score ~91%) appear in the scraped content. Governance, organizational structure, and distribution mechanics are not documented in the supplied files. There are no founder names, executive team bios, company or foundation registration details, or an explicit governance model (on-chain DAO, council, or token-voting mechanism) present in the provided material. Likewise, premine/PIP/initial distribution percentages and dev-fund allocations are not reported in the supplied sources. Service integrations (explorers, indexers, or oracle providers) are referenced in the scraped context at low confidence; CoinMarketCap and other analytics/market platforms are clearly used to present MET data, but there is no explicit, high-confidence list of third-party infrastructure providers in the extracted files. Where data is absent I have not invented details; instead, the profile focuses on verifiable market metrics and product design notes that were present in the source documents. Links - Website: https://meteora.so/ - Whitepaper: N/A - GitHub: N/A --- About the D-Score: BlockIndex.AI rates decentralization from 0 to 100 across node distribution, initial distribution, governance, age and history, and autonomy. Methodology: https://blockindex.ai/dscore