# Rollbit Coin (RLB): D-Score 27/100 — Centralized Leaning

**BlockIndex D-Score: 27/100 (Centralized Leaning).** Rollbit Coin (RLB) is a Layer 2 cryptocurrency using PoS consensus. Rollbit Coin (RLB): ERC-20 utility token powering Rollbit's lottery and platform benefits with deflationary burn mechanics.

_Source: https://blockindex.ai/coin/rlb · Data by BlockIndex.AI · Updated 2026-06-19_

## D-Score breakdown (0-100, higher means more decentralized)
| Component | Score |
| --- | --- |
| Overall D-Score | 27 |
| Node distribution | 0 |
| Initial distribution | 0 |
| Governance | 16 |
| Age and history | 11 |
| Autonomy | 0 |

## Key facts
- Layer: Layer 2
- Consensus: PoS (N/A)
- Launch: Airdrop (2020)
- Founder: N/A
- VC funded: No
- Max supply: N/A
- Circulating: 1,644,567,202

## Market data (as of 2026-06-19)
- Price: $0.06
- Market cap: $99.84M
- 24h volume: $418,206.73
- 24h change: -0.96% · 7d change: -0.10%

## About
Rollbit Coin (RLB) is the native ERC-20 utility token for the Rollbit platform, introduced primarily to capture and concentrate user engagement within Rollbit’s casino and trading ecosystem. Launched via an airdrop to pre-existing Rollbit users in February 2020, RLB was designed from inception as a product-facing asset: staking RLB is required to participate in the platform’s lottery, and holding or staking the token confers various platform benefits such as reduced trading fees and increased rakeback. The token’s economic design is tightly coupled to platform-level revenue flows — for example, a portion of casino profits is allocated to the lottery prize pool — so demand for RLB is driven largely by user activity and product adoption rather than native protocol-level incentives.

Technically, RLB is implemented as an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum mainnet. It does not operate its own blockchain or validator set; instead it leverages Ethereum’s post-merge proof-of-stake security model for settlement and execution of its smart contracts. Key contract-level mechanics documented in source materials include a staking mechanism that requires a small fee per lottery round (0.20% of staked amount) and a deflationary burn component: half of the staking fee (0.10% of staked amount) is burned and the other half is allocated to Rollbots NFTs. The contract address is published and indexed by common market and explorer services (CoinMarketCap, Etherscan/DexScan references appear in the sources). Source-level materials do not include a public GitHub repository or detailed developer documentation in the provided snippets.

From a tokenomics perspective, RLB has a declared maximum supply of 5,000,000,000 RLB and a circulating supply reported at the time of the snapshots as approximately 1.806B RLB (holders ~21.36K as shown in CoinMarketCap extracts). Distribution was performed via an airdrop to Rollbit users rather than an ICO; no explicit premine percentage or PIP (public initial percentage) is documented in the provided files. The economic model is distinguished by recurring, platform-driven deflationary pressure: with staking activity and lottery participation, tokens are continuously burned. Materials provided to reviewers note an illustrative maximum annualized burn rate if an extreme fraction of supply were staked (the documents cite an illustrative ~45% annualized burn in a hypothetical full-stake scenario), but that figure is outcome-dependent on user behavior rather than a deterministic emission schedule.

In terms of market observability and ecosystem access, RLB is tracked on major aggregator platforms (CoinMarketCap) and is listed on multiple centralized exchanges per the verified exchange extraction (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, Bybit, Bitget). Common wallets and wallet integrations are referenced in the verified data: hardware (Ledger), desktop clients (Electrum, MEW), and popular browser extensions (MetaMask, Phantom, Nami). There is no on-chain DAO or on-chain governance mechanism described in the provided materials; governance and operational decisions appear to be platform-controlled (off-chain). The documentation in the sources does not provide company filings or a formal roadmap, and details about the team (founders, CEO, CTO) are not present in the supplied snippets.

Risk considerations center on platform concentration and product-dependence of token demand. Because RLB’s utility is primarily realized within the Rollbit platform (lottery participation, reduced fees, rakeback), demand and the efficacy of the burn mechanism depend on sustained user engagement and casino revenue. That creates single-platform exposure: token value and supply dynamics may be strongly correlated with Rollbit’s commercial performance. Security and stability indicators in the provided materials show no documented hacks, freezes, or major incidents tied specifically to RLB; audits are referenced generally but no dated audit reports were supplied in the sources. Overall, RLB should be evaluated as a product-aligned ERC-20 utility token whose long-term token dynamics are highly dependent on platform adoption and user behavior rather than native protocol-level issuance controls.

## Links
- Website: https://rollbit.com/
- Whitepaper: https://whitepaper.rollbot.com/rlb-whitepaper
- GitHub: N/A

---
About the D-Score: BlockIndex.AI rates decentralization from 0 to 100 across node distribution, initial distribution, governance, age and history, and autonomy. Methodology: https://blockindex.ai/dscore